markfromireland

UK, Slave Trade, Human RightsJune 30, 2006 4:56 pm

Full Hansard Report below. In the report:

  • (con) means that that MP is from the Conservative Party.
  • (lab) means that that MP is from the Labour Party.
  • CPS means the Crown Prosecution Service.

The context for this is a Europe-wide attempt to crack down on human trafficing. The operation is being co-ordinated by Europol:

Solicitor-General The Solicitor-General was asked—Human Trafficking

19. Mr. Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con): How many cases were brought by the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to human trafficking in the last five years. [80900]

The Solicitor-General (Mr. Mike O’Brien): Prior to 10 February 2003, the CPS prosecuted cases of human trafficking under a wide variety of offences, so it is difficult to be specific about numbers. Since that date, new laws have been put in place, and CPS statistics show that 43 human trafficking charges have been brought. It is anticipated that further charges will be brought as a result of the success of the recent Operation Pentameter.

Mr. Bone: I thank the Solicitor-General for his answer, and I congratulate the Government on what they have done so far. Does he agree that one problem for the CPS in prosecuting the evil people who engage in human trafficking is the fact that the young women are often scared to give evidence because they fear deportation?

The Solicitor-General: That problem sometimes arises, and we are looking at ways of tackling it. As part of Operation Pentameter, a close working relationship was developed with the Poppy project, which enabled the police to provide some reassurance. We are looking, too, at other safeguards, and we recently consulted on a convention that may assist with the process of enabling those women to testify, but there are some concerns that we still have to work through.

Ms Sally Keeble (Northampton, North) (Lab): How many of those cases involved the trafficking of children? Does my hon. and learned Friend agree that just as it is hard to deal with the trafficking of women, it is also hard to deal with the trafficking of children, who are often unable to explain what has happened to them?

The Solicitor-General: My hon. Friend is right. A ministerial sub-committee has been set up and is being co-chaired by me and a Home Office Minister, and it will examine the trafficking of children and the trafficking of adults for sexual exploitation and for forced labour. My hon. Friend is right to point out that there are particular problems in dealing with children, and we need to develop police, immigration and criminal justice agencies. We also need NGOs to provide support and ensure that the future of such children is safeguarded not only in this country, but if they return to their parents in another country.

29 Jun 2006 : Column 378

Mr. Dominic Grieve (Beaconsfield) (Con): The Solicitor-General will be aware that the 43 cases since the new Act came into force reflect only a small proportion of the problem, because the evidence is clear that the rate of human trafficking has been growing rapidly in our country. Can he tell the House any more about how the CPS is liaising with the police to deal with the matter? Given his knowledge of what is in the pipeline, are we going to see an increasing number of such prosecutions, and is that an area which requires specialist casework within the CPS?

The Solicitor-General: The CPS is developing champions in each area who will deal with liaison on human trafficking. The hon. Gentleman is right to say that the problem is growing. Operation Pentameter was more successful than expected, in the sense that it revealed the scale of the problem across the country. The police visited 515 premises, 232 arrests were made and 188 women were recovered, of whom 84 were identified as victims of trafficking—it is probable that more of the women were trafficked but were not prepared to admit it for reasons that we have already discussed. We also recovered £280,000 in cash assets. That was only a short project, so the hon. Gentleman is right to say that the problem is developing, which is why the CPS has identified champions in each area. The police also developed their expertise through Operation Pentameter, and we must ensure that the lessons are learned to deal with the problem in the future.

Iraq war, Arms Trade, Civil War, UK, US, Slave Trade, Mercenaries, TerrorismMay 1, 2006 1:49 am

Attacking The Tail (Again)

Let’s read the pabulum first I’ve highlighted the weasel words:

3 Civilians Killed by Bomb in Iraq
By DAVID STRINGER, Associated Press WriterSun Apr 30, 10:13 AM ET
Sun Apr 30, 10:13 AM ET

LONDON - Three security contractors were killed and two others injured in a roadside bomb attack 30 miles south of Baghdad on Sunday, Britain’s Foreign Office said.

[snip]

All five contractors had been traveling in a sports utility vehicle which was attacked on Sunday morning, according to an Iraqi police report.

“A private security convoy was attacked this morning, three people were killed and two others injured,” said a spokeswoman for Britain’s Foreign Office, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, in line with policy.

[snip]

She said the condition of the two injured contractors is not known, but confirmed both are being treated in a hospital in Baghdad.

The contractors were working for London-based private security company Aegis Defense Services Ltd., a British official said, speaking on condition of anonymity, as he was not authorized to confirm details.

Staff at the London headquarters of Aegis, one of the biggest security contractors in Iraq, were not immediately available for comment.

The company, established in 2002 by Tim Spicer, a former British Army officer, is contracted by U.S. authorities to provide services including “protection of both civilian and military personnel traveling throughout the country.”


This is a perfect example of precisely what’s wrong with swallowing Washington and London’s bland jargon. They weren’t civilians . Civilians is the one thing they were not. They were MERCENARIES. Let’s do some rewrites truthfully this time:

3 Civilians Mercenaries Killed by Bomb in Iraq

LONDON - Three security contractors mercenaries were killed and two others injured in a roadside bomb attack 30 miles south of Baghdad on Sunday, Britain’s Foreign Office said.

[snip]

All five contractors mercenaries had been traveling in a sports utility vehicle which was attacked on Sunday morning, according to an Iraqi police report.

“A private security convoy mercenary convoy was attacked this morning, three mercenaries were killed and two others injured,” said a spokeswoman for Britain’s Foreign Office, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, in line with policy.

[snip]

She said the condition of the two injured mercenaries is not known, but confirmed both are being treated in a hospital in Baghdad.

The contractors mercenaries were working for London-based private security mercenary rental company Aegis Defense Mercenary Services Ltd., a British official said, speaking on condition of anonymity, as he was not authorized to confirm details.

Staff at the London headquarters of Aegis, one of the biggest providers of mercenaries in Iraq, were not immediately available for comment.

The company, established in 2002 by Tim Spicer, a former British Army officer, is contracted by U.S. authorities to provide mercenaries including “protection of both civilian and military personnel traveling throughout the country.”

See also: Attacking the Tail on my other blog in particular the comments .

I keep on saying this — using mercenaries apart from any other consideration is a sure fire guarantee that you’ll lose in a colonial war such as this. The same is true of torture and the two go hand-in-hand. It’s a sure fire guarantee that your losses are going to escalate. Both are first class recruiting sergeants for those fighting the invaders/occupiers. The US presence in Iraq has no tail. A few people are getting very rich because of that fact. A lot of the American dead are dead because of it too.

Why?

Because whenever the mercenaries get out of their depth, which they do with monotonous regularity, they get in touch with the regular army to come and rescue them. They then, having been rescued, leave the army to cope with the well and truly boiling over situation that they’ve created. That’s on top of the Army having to protect supply convoys incapable of defending themselves.

There is no distinction between a mercenary and any other hired killer such as a mafia hitman. None. I do not mourn their loss.

Addendum:

I’ve published a photo of the car in which the mercenaries died together with a composite image showing the blast pattern over at my other blog. As I said I cannot find it within myself to mourn the mercenaries. I do however have a lot of pity for the police in Al-Suwaira.

markfromireland

Iraq war, Arms Trade, Civil War, US, Slave Trade, Human Rights, MercenariesApril 24, 2006 3:49 pm

What the article below from KR/Chicago Tribune which I’ve reproduced in full is talking about is slavery.
See also this article from Kerala Monitor (scroll down) See also http://freetheslaves.net/ (US) and The Anti-Slavery Society (UK). For the record I’m one of many people who having seen what went on in Kosovo have been warning about this for years. When I was interviewed about it by a freelance journalist who subsequently contacted the US owned and run firm involved their response was as follows:

  1. An outright denial. Followed by;
  2. A threatening letter from a firm of lawyers threatening to bankrupt her for slander and libel.

She dropped the story.

I don’t know why everybody is acting so surprised and shocked at these latest revelations. It’s not as if this hasn’t happened before or if we’re talking about sex slavery in other places. Did I mention that Iraq has more mercenaries security contractors in it than soldiers? No?

Iraq has more mercenaries security contractors in it than soldiers.

Don’t you just love the smell [PDF from UN Office on Drugs and Crime] of freedom [PDF from UN Office on Drugs and Crime] on the march it smells like - slavery.

markfromireland


Commander: Contractors violating U.S. trafficking laws
BY CAM SIMPSON
Chicago Tribune

WASHINGTON - The top U.S. commander in Iraq has ordered sweeping changes for privatized military support operations after confirming violations of human-trafficking laws and other abuses by contractors involving possibly thousands of foreign workers on American bases, according to records obtained by the Chicago Tribune.

Gen. George Casey ordered that contractors be required by May 1 to return passports that have been illegally confiscated from laborers on U.S. bases after determining that such practices violated U.S. laws against trafficking for forced or coerced labor. Human brokers and subcontractors from South Asia to the Middle East have worked together to import thousands of laborers into Iraq from impoverished countries.

Two memos obtained by the Tribune indicate that Casey’s office concluded that the practice of confiscating passports from such workers was both widespread on American bases and in violation of the U.S. trafficking laws.

The memos, including an order dated April 4 and titled “Subject: Prevention of Trafficking in Persons in MNF-I,” or Multinational Forces-Iraq, say the military also confirmed a host of other abuses during an inspection of contracting activities supporting the U.S. military in Iraq. They include deceptive hiring practices; excessive fees charged by overseas job brokers who lure workers into Iraq; substandard living conditions once laborers arrive; violations of Iraqi immigration laws; and a lack of mandatory “awareness training” on U.S. bases concerning human trafficking.

Along with a separate memo from a top military procurement official to all contractors in Iraq, dated April 19 and titled, “Withholding of Passports, Trafficking in Persons,” Casey’s orders promise harsh actions against firms that fail to return passports or end other abusive practices. Contracts could be terminated, contractors could be blacklisted from future work, and commanders could physically bar firms from bases, the memos show.

“Contracts must incorporate appropriate language to compel the protection of individual rights (at both the contract and subcontract levels),” Casey’s orders say, adding that it was his goal to “to promote (the) rule of law in Iraq and in the labor recruiting process.”

Under future contracts, Casey is requiring that all firms, no matter how far down the chain, “provide workers with a signed copy of their employment contract that defines the terms of their employment.”

He’s ordering that contracts include “measurable, enforceable standards for living conditions (e.g., sanitation, health, safety, etc.) and establish 50 feet as the minimum acceptable square footage of personal living space per worker,” after finding that some conditions were substandard.

Contractors and subcontractors also must “comply with international laws” regarding transit, exit and entry procedures, “requirements for work visas,” and Iraqi immigration laws.

The orders also mandate that future contracts and subcontracts include “language that prohibits contractors and subcontractors at all tiers from utilizing unlicensed recruiting firms, or firms that charge illegal recruiting fees.”

The short-term impact of the orders is unclear, because the separate memo to contractors, which is dated April 19 and written by Col. Robert K. Boyles, a top official with the Joint Contracting Command-Iraq/Afghanistan, shows many of the reforms would be implemented by changes in the language in future contracts.

Nonetheless, the findings and actions represent a dramatic turnabout for the U.S. military, and follow three months of behind-the-scenes pressure on the Defense Department from State Department officials charged with monitoring and combating human trafficking worldwide.

The State Department launched an investigation and promised other actions earlier this year in response to a series published Oct. 9-10 by the Tribune, “Pipeline to Peril,” that detailed many of the abuses now cited in the memos.

The stories disclosed the often-illicit networks used to recruit low-skilled laborers from some of the world’s most impoverished and remote locales to work in menial jobs on American bases in Iraq.

Although other firms also have contracts supporting the military in Iraq, the United States has outsourced vital support operations to Halliburton subsidiary KBR at an unprecedented scale, at a cost to the United States of more than $12 billion as of late last year.

KBR, in turn, has outsourced much of that work to more than 200 subcontractors, many of them based in Middle Eastern nations condemned by the United States for failing to stem human trafficking into their own borders or for perpetrating other human rights abuses against foreign workers.

KBR’s subcontractors employ an army of workers to dish out food, wash clothes, clean latrines and carry out virtually every other menial task. About 35,000 of the 48,000 people working under the privatization contract last year were “Third Country Nationals,” who are non-Americans imported from outside Iraq, KBR has said.

“Pipeline to Peril,” which was based on reporting in the United States, Jordan, Iraq, Nepal and Saudi Arabia, described how some subcontractors and a chain of human brokers allegedly engaged in the same kinds of abuses routinely condemned by the State Department as human trafficking.

The newspaper retraced the journey of 12 men recruited in 2004 from rural villages in the Himalayan kingdom of Nepal and documented a trail of deceit, fraud and negligence stretching into Jordan and Iraq. Most of the men had contracts filed with their government falsely promising them positions at a five-star hotel in Amman, yet all 12 were sent into Iraq in August 2004. They were ultimately kidnapped from an unprotected caravan traveling along what was then one of the most dangerous roadways in the world: the Amman-to-Baghdad highway.

All 12 men were subsequently executed by militants in likely the single worst massacre of foreign workers in Iraq since the American-led invasion more than three years ago.

Those workers and others suffered from a chain of exploitation that began in their home countries, where families often assumed huge debts to pay fees demanded by brokers, to Iraq. Even after discovering they’d been deceived, workers felt compelled to head into the war zone, or remain in danger for much longer than they desired, just to pay those debts.

The Tribune also found evidence that subcontractors and brokers routinely seized workers’ passports, deceived them about their safety or contract terms and, in at least one case, allegedly tried to force terrified men into Iraq under the threat of cutting off their food and water.

The series also showed how KBR and the military left virtually every aspect of the recruitment, deployment and safety of such workers in the hands of their subcontractors. They also allowed subcontractors to employ workers from countries that had banned the deployment of their citizens to Iraq, meaning thousands were trafficked through illicit channels.

When told of the memos, John Miller, who heads the State Department office to monitor and combat human trafficking, credited the Tribune for shedding light on the illicit practices. He also praised the military for taking corrective action.

“Needless to say, we’re delighted,” Miller said. “This is progress, and we agree with the steps they’ve taken.”

Although allegations of such abuses began appearing in international press reports more than two years ago, and the Tribune’s own investigation was published last October, one of the memos calls on the military and the State Department to develop “an effective media strategy emphasizing the (military) Command’s pro-active response to the problem.”

Separate records also show that similar allegations had been raised in September 2004 with Joseph Schmitz, who was then the Department of Defense inspector general.

Schmitz did not respond in any detail until nearly a year later, saying in an Aug. 25, 2005, letter to Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., that there was a “list of corrective measures” ordered by coalition military officials in Iraq following “a preliminary inquiry” into the allegations. The letter did not mention passport seizures or violations of U.S. laws against human trafficking, but said living conditions “required further attention” and that officials were “monitoring the status of corrections” purportedly under way.

Schmitz resigned about two weeks later amid accusations that he stonewalled investigations. He took a job with Blackwater USA, a private security contractor.

It wasn’t the only time officials were made aware of such allegations. Last summer, the Army, which oversees the KBR privatization deal, deflected questions from the Tribune about human trafficking onto American bases in Iraq by saying “these are not Army issues.” Similarly, Halliburton said in a written statement that questions regarding “the recruitment practices” of its subcontractors “should be directed to the subcontractor.”

Melissa Norcross, a Halliburton spokeswoman, issued a statement from the company Sunday saying that KBR “fully supports the Department of Defense’s efforts to ensure that all contractor and subcontractor personnel working for the U.S. government be treated in a fair and humanitarian manner.”

The statement also echoed previous press releases from the company, saying KBR “operates under a rigorous code of business conduct that outlines legal and ethical behaviors that all employees and subcontractors are expected to follow in every aspect of their work. We do not tolerate any exceptions to this Code at any level of our company.”

The company has refused to say whether it has ever taken any action against subcontractors.

Another memo obtained by the Tribune, dated April 13 and addressed to all KBR project managers, deputy project managers and operations managers, indicates the company is requiring all of its personnel to undergo human-trafficking awareness training because of Casey’s orders.

A U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, confirmed the issuance of Casey’s orders in a statement to the Tribune on Sunday, saying the “rights to freedom of movement and quality living standards are serious issues.”

He also claimed, “There’s always been a focus on this, and this is one more clarification of that,” adding that the U.S. military has the ability to “terminate contracts and keep people off of bases.”

Casey’s orders came at about the same time the Defense Department published long-awaited interim rules that allow officials to cancel overseas defense contracts for trafficking violations.

But the orders go well beyond what is contained in the rules, and indicate that most of the measures stem from an inspection of the support operations by Casey’s command. Johnson said that inspection was conducted by the command’s inspector general’s office, a process that was started last October.

While the orders do not indicate how many workers have had their passports seized, the April 19 memo to contractors says evidence indicated a widespread practice of “holding and withholding employee passports.” It says passports are seized, in part, to keep workers from accepting jobs with other firms.

The Tribune identified three major KBR subcontractors that employed thousands of foreign workers on U.S. installations in Iraq and confiscated the passports of their foreign workers as a standard practice. At least two of those firms also have their own contracts with the United States.

The ultimate impact of the new orders will depend on how they’re implemented, and on several key, unanswered questions. Included among them: how U.S. military officials in Iraq hope to influence the conduct of village recruiters and human brokers across the globe who are several links up the chain from the subcontractors ultimately employing workers in Iraq.

Johnson said U.S. military officials would not immediately refer any contractors or subcontractors for prosecution.

Miller agreed that important questions remained, but called the new rules a major step forward. “I think they are heading in the right direction.”