markfromireland

Iraq war, Civil War, UK, US, TerrorismSeptember 3, 2006 3:09 pm

I think we’ve been all been expecting, and dreading, this. I’ve written about it repeatedly recently:

Back on July 27th I wrote about the Statement issued by Grand Ayatollah Najafi covered in this article in Al-Zaman [Arabic]:

“the situation in the south of the country is coming very badly unstuck for the green zone government. In particular this statement by Grand Ayatollah Bashir al-Najafi is ominous:

“We fear the coming of a day when we cannot restrain a revolution of the people, with all its unsavory consequences.”

Al-Najafi is often thought to be second most important of the four Grand Ayatollahs living in Najaf with Grand Ayatollah Al-Sistani being “primus inter pares” (the fifth Grand Ayatollah Kazem al-Hairi lives in Iran.) Al-Najafi’s office would not under any circumstances have issued that statement unless the Grand Ayatollahs (who act collegially) were of the opinion that their ability to restrain their followers was slipping. … … … .”

On August 10th I wrote this:

“It remains to be seen whether the Grand Ayatollahs already deeply concerned that their ability to restrain their followers is slipping will succeed in holding them back one more time. Should they fail the bloodbath created by the American occupation’s policies in Iraq will pale into insignificance.”

(more…)

Iraq war, Sectarian Attacks, Civil War, American HysteriaJuly 13, 2006 6:13 pm

There are two horrific stories in today’s azzaman.com (Al-Zaman) the first which can be found here [Arabic text] says that the militias who conducted what is best described as a pogrom on July 9th in Baghdad’s Jihad neighbourhood knew who they were looking for. Here’s what Juan Cole has to say about the same story.

“Shiite militamen who undertook the killings had with them long lists of ex-Baathists who had held office under the old regime but had been purged by the Debaathification Committee. The Debaathification Committee has been dominated by Ahmad Chalabi, and much of the documentation for its work was turned over to Chalabi by Donald Rumsfeld’s Department of Defense. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki also played a central role in the Debaathification Committee.”

For more on Chalabi see the Sunday Herald:

Unveiled: the thugs Bush wants in place of Saddam

‘I examined my notes of the interviews I conducted with 82 Iraqi opposition leaders, and began identifying those on my list whose thinking resembles Saddam’s. To my horror, I decided 75 of the people I interviewed were men who would kill to achieve their goal.’ One can only wonder whether Washington has come to the same conclusion, or indeed really cares.”

also see this Sourcewatch profileGo read the whole posting on “Informed Comment,” Cole entirely correctly discusses the role of the Debaathification Committee and explains its connection both to Ahmed Chalabi and Nour al-Maliki but I think that Cole is missing the significance of some very important points towards the end of the story.

The first is that according to the witnesses quoted in the story the killers were young, relatively well armed, well dressed, and not particularly choosy about who they killed - if they couldn’t find the person they were looking for from their list they just killed somebody else in their place. The second though is a bit more telling. According to al-Zaman they co-ordinated their actions using walkie-talkies and radios, NOT, mobile ‘phones and that they were observed using these apparently to “screen” people whom they had captured, the implication of the story being that they were asking for and getting orders about who to kill. That doesn’t sound like any of the various groups loosely associated with Muqata al-Sadr’s movement to me, and it certainly doesn’t sound like his Mahdi Militia.

The membership of the Mahdi militia are young, true, but they’re also impoverished and have to buy their weapons and other equipment out of their own pockets - even allowing for a certain amount of racketeering and “protection” money they just don’t have the cash to equip themselves with sophisticated comms equipment. ‘Nor is it likely that such equipment was “borrowed” from, for example the Ministry of Health, (which is under Sadrite control) because to the best of my knowledge and belief they don’t have a plethora of such equipment either. Furthermore involvement by the Mahdi militia in such a pogrom would put the kybosh on al-Sadr’s efforts to reach out to Sunnis. It’s far more likely that this pogrom is associated with much more avowedly sectarian elements within the green zone government, some have suggested Badr brigade involvement which is far more intuitively plausible.

A Very Rough Guide to Baghdad: Baghdad has somewhere between 5½ and 6 million inhabitants. It is divided by the Tigris into two main areas:

  1. The left bank of the river is called Al Rassafa.
  2. The right bank is called Al Karkh.

Al-Rassafa is older and the population is mainly middle to low income. It’s a very highly commercial area.

Al-Karkh is generally less heavily commercialised than Al Rassafa, the exception is Al Mansour which is an important commercial area and has a number of ministeries. The population in Al Karkh is generally middle to high income particularly in Al-Mansour.

A very rough guide to Baghdad Districts by Sect:

  • Adhamiya: majority sunni
  • Baghdad Al-jadida: mixed
  • Dora: mixed becoming mostly Sunni
  • Hurrya city: mixed
  • Kadhimya: shiite majority
  • Karrada: mixed
  • Mansour (Al-Mansour): mixed (many secular Al- Mansour is prosperous.)
  • Sadr City: majority shi’ite

The second story can be found here [Arabic text] it describes how residents in Amiriyah, Al-Dura (Dora), Ghazaliyah, Khadra, Jihad, and Sayyidiyah which are largely Sunni districts in Western baghdad have formed vigilante associations to keep deathsquads out. Cole has picked up on this article too but his posting is short, and some context is needed here’s what he has to say:

“Al-Zaman/ DPA say that Sunni Arabs in the West Baghdad districts of Amiriyah, Khadra, Jihad, Ghazaliyah, Sayyidiyah and Al-Dura (Dora) have formed emergency neighborhood patrols for fear that Shiite militias from nearby Shiite-dominated districts to the east will make further raids into their areas. Muezzins or callers to prayer in the Sunni mosques of the Khadra district used amplifiers to call for volunteers, and dozens of young men responded by taking up arms. They especially hastened to do so after armed militiamen attacked the Muluki Mosque in al-Amiriyah District near Karkh late on Wednesday. They set up concrete blocks as barriers barring entry to the Khadra District. As soon as the callers to prayer broadcast the attack on the Muluki Mosque, shopkeepers and merchants in the commercial district closed their establishments.

This narrative of innocent Sunni Arabs policing their neighborhoods from predatory Shiite attacks on mosques obscures those other processes that PM al-Maliki described, whereby the Sunni Arab guerrilla movement is trying to take over these districts politically and extend its sway to Karkh [see: sidebox - mfi]. In a civil war, disentangling offense and defense is no easy task.”

I don’t agree with Juan that this is a case of a narrative being obscured. In a sense there’s nothing particularly new about this development. Vigilante groups in Baghdad’s middle-class and upper-class suburbs first sprang up in as a defense against looters in the chaos immediately following the downfall of Saddam Hussein’s regime. Residents manned checkpoints to protect their homes and shops. It makes sense in the current climate for residents particularly residents who feel themselves to be under threat to mount checkpoints again. This needs to be seen as part of post-Samarra Iraq. The post-Samarra bombing violence has come in two waves:

  • The first targeted Sunni mosques and the offices of political parties.
  • The second wave is targetting people and it is in response to this second wave of violence that these vigilante neighbourhood defense groups are re-forming.

As you might expect these groups are almost exclusively centred around mosques. There are three reasons for this:

  1. Mosques are social focal points, even in “secular” areas. They make natural storage points for arms and medical supplies.
  2. Their architecture (high rooves and minarets,) make them natural vantage points from which to keep watch.
  3. Mosques typically have reasonably powerful public loudspeakers (business for these is booming) also and these can be and are used to broadcast alerts to residents to get their guns and rush to defend the barricades.

As yet these groups aren’t large armed formations. They typically operate as small separate groups of up to about 50 volunteers who take guard duty in shifts. So far they are are primarily defensive and are not formally linked to the anti-occupation fighters. I have no idea why on earth Juan Cole thinks Maliki’s claims in this regard are reliable. When you read the article on azzaman.com it’s describing a very typical “neighbourhood watch”/protection scheme. There are concrete and wire barricades put up to control access to the neighbourhood. These are typically manned by young volunteers. In the event of an attempted incursion or of an attack a combination of calls for defenders broadcast from the mosque and mobile telephone alerts issued by the perimeter defenders causes residents to pick up their guns, rush to close the roads into the neighbourhood, and repel the attackers. This pattern is identical to that everywhere else in Baghdad, Sunni, Shia, and mixed alike. In the light of the horrific events in Jihad on the 9th it is completely unsurprising that residents in Amiriyah, Dora, Ghazaliyah, Khadra, Jihad, and Sayyidiyah would step up their defenses. It is also completely unsurprising that people in those areas would ask why it is that many of these death squads seem to know who to look for and where they live. The article quotes one resident in particular - 75 year old Abu Omar as saying that the increasing attacks on mosques, especially after nightfall, have made these precautions necessary. Saying that there had been repeated attacks in Amiriyah, Jihad, and Sayyidiyah by attacksers wearing the uniform of the police. The article quotes other residents as saying that it was their duty to repel attacks by militia elements and that the absence of the State [would] create a law of the jungle and the rule of organised crime syndicates, the forces of terrorism and subversion, and out-of-control militias. It’s worth noting that in al-Jihad, Sheikh Hussein, like al-Sadr preaches unity saying “It’s the occupation which wants us to fight each other,” and that the same is being said by community leaders in al-Furat, which unlike al-Jihad is almost entirely Sunni.

Cole and other western commentators seem absolutely determined to decree that full scale civil war has erupted. Baghdadis are by no means convinced of this, what they are convinced of is that it is the occupation itself which is driving the country towards one.

ends @ crosspost

markfromireland

Iraq war, Arms Trade, Civil War, UK, US, Slave Trade, Mercenaries, TerrorismMay 1, 2006 1:49 am

Attacking The Tail (Again)

Let’s read the pabulum first I’ve highlighted the weasel words:

3 Civilians Killed by Bomb in Iraq
By DAVID STRINGER, Associated Press WriterSun Apr 30, 10:13 AM ET
Sun Apr 30, 10:13 AM ET

LONDON - Three security contractors were killed and two others injured in a roadside bomb attack 30 miles south of Baghdad on Sunday, Britain’s Foreign Office said.

[snip]

All five contractors had been traveling in a sports utility vehicle which was attacked on Sunday morning, according to an Iraqi police report.

“A private security convoy was attacked this morning, three people were killed and two others injured,” said a spokeswoman for Britain’s Foreign Office, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, in line with policy.

[snip]

She said the condition of the two injured contractors is not known, but confirmed both are being treated in a hospital in Baghdad.

The contractors were working for London-based private security company Aegis Defense Services Ltd., a British official said, speaking on condition of anonymity, as he was not authorized to confirm details.

Staff at the London headquarters of Aegis, one of the biggest security contractors in Iraq, were not immediately available for comment.

The company, established in 2002 by Tim Spicer, a former British Army officer, is contracted by U.S. authorities to provide services including “protection of both civilian and military personnel traveling throughout the country.”


This is a perfect example of precisely what’s wrong with swallowing Washington and London’s bland jargon. They weren’t civilians . Civilians is the one thing they were not. They were MERCENARIES. Let’s do some rewrites truthfully this time:

3 Civilians Mercenaries Killed by Bomb in Iraq

LONDON - Three security contractors mercenaries were killed and two others injured in a roadside bomb attack 30 miles south of Baghdad on Sunday, Britain’s Foreign Office said.

[snip]

All five contractors mercenaries had been traveling in a sports utility vehicle which was attacked on Sunday morning, according to an Iraqi police report.

“A private security convoy mercenary convoy was attacked this morning, three mercenaries were killed and two others injured,” said a spokeswoman for Britain’s Foreign Office, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, in line with policy.

[snip]

She said the condition of the two injured mercenaries is not known, but confirmed both are being treated in a hospital in Baghdad.

The contractors mercenaries were working for London-based private security mercenary rental company Aegis Defense Mercenary Services Ltd., a British official said, speaking on condition of anonymity, as he was not authorized to confirm details.

Staff at the London headquarters of Aegis, one of the biggest providers of mercenaries in Iraq, were not immediately available for comment.

The company, established in 2002 by Tim Spicer, a former British Army officer, is contracted by U.S. authorities to provide mercenaries including “protection of both civilian and military personnel traveling throughout the country.”

See also: Attacking the Tail on my other blog in particular the comments .

I keep on saying this — using mercenaries apart from any other consideration is a sure fire guarantee that you’ll lose in a colonial war such as this. The same is true of torture and the two go hand-in-hand. It’s a sure fire guarantee that your losses are going to escalate. Both are first class recruiting sergeants for those fighting the invaders/occupiers. The US presence in Iraq has no tail. A few people are getting very rich because of that fact. A lot of the American dead are dead because of it too.

Why?

Because whenever the mercenaries get out of their depth, which they do with monotonous regularity, they get in touch with the regular army to come and rescue them. They then, having been rescued, leave the army to cope with the well and truly boiling over situation that they’ve created. That’s on top of the Army having to protect supply convoys incapable of defending themselves.

There is no distinction between a mercenary and any other hired killer such as a mafia hitman. None. I do not mourn their loss.

Addendum:

I’ve published a photo of the car in which the mercenaries died together with a composite image showing the blast pattern over at my other blog. As I said I cannot find it within myself to mourn the mercenaries. I do however have a lot of pity for the police in Al-Suwaira.

markfromireland

Iraq war, Iran, Sectarian Attacks, Civil War, US, Terrorism, Turkey, KurdistanApril 27, 2006 3:13 pm

Earlier this month Turkey deployed an additional 40,000 troops in the southeast.

“the Kurdistan Workers Party is trying to send half of its 4,900 militants (based) in northern Iraq here and preparing for attacks in Turkey’s cities.”
This is in addition to the 220,000 to 250,000 troops it already has there.

See also;

KURDISH INTIFADA?

Clashes in Southeastern Turkey on the Rise

Violence is on the rise in southeastern Turkey as the Kurdistan Worker’s Party increases its guerilla activity. The government in Ankara is worried about a Kurdish intifada.

Rice offers modest aid to Turkey
By Anne Gearan
Associated Press

ANKARA, Turkey - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pledged only modest U.S. help yesterday as Turkey tries to counter a threat from Kurdish rebels using bases across its border with Iraq. She asked for patience with the new Iraqi government.

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said the Turkey-based Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) had free run of a swath of northern Iraq and had set up training camps and bases. Turkey fears that civil unrest in Iraq could lead to the fragmentation of the country and often has called on the United States to stop PKK fighters from using Iraq as a base to stage attacks inside Turkey.

“We’ve shared our expectation that we expect more from them,” Gul said. “Especially, I have shared with Rice that the terrorist organization, benefiting from the power vacuum in northern Iraq, has started to damage Turkey again.”

Rice did not dispute that, but she chose her words carefully.

“We believe that it is important that we make joint efforts, through information-sharing and other means, to prevent… any vacuum from being used as a way to inflict harm here in Turkey,” Rice said after meeting with Gul in Ankara. “We need to work with the new Iraqi government, and we will do that.”

She said the United States, Turkey and Iraq could revive a three-way discussion of the PKK once the Iraqi leadership selected last weekend has formed a new, permanent government.

The United States wants Turkey to hold back from crossing the Iraq border to pursue rebels.

Rice met large and sometimes violent protests against the war in Iraq and U.S. foreign policy during diplomatic visits yesterday to Greece and Turkey

Readers with good memories will recall that Turkey refused to allow its territory to be used to invade Iraq. There seems to be absolutely no level of incompetence below which the Bush administration cannot sink.

See also Juan Cole today 27/04/2006.

and:

Turkey Masses Troops on Iraqi Border by Aaron Glantz (antiwar.com)

and:

Susan at News About Iraq has links to several stories here and accurately characterises this administration as delusional.

markfromireland
(crossposted from my other blog where the title is exapanded somewhat to reflect just how bad this news is.)

Iraq war, Arms Trade, Civil War, US, Slave Trade, Human Rights, MercenariesApril 24, 2006 3:49 pm

What the article below from KR/Chicago Tribune which I’ve reproduced in full is talking about is slavery.
See also this article from Kerala Monitor (scroll down) See also http://freetheslaves.net/ (US) and The Anti-Slavery Society (UK). For the record I’m one of many people who having seen what went on in Kosovo have been warning about this for years. When I was interviewed about it by a freelance journalist who subsequently contacted the US owned and run firm involved their response was as follows:

  1. An outright denial. Followed by;
  2. A threatening letter from a firm of lawyers threatening to bankrupt her for slander and libel.

She dropped the story.

I don’t know why everybody is acting so surprised and shocked at these latest revelations. It’s not as if this hasn’t happened before or if we’re talking about sex slavery in other places. Did I mention that Iraq has more mercenaries security contractors in it than soldiers? No?

Iraq has more mercenaries security contractors in it than soldiers.

Don’t you just love the smell [PDF from UN Office on Drugs and Crime] of freedom [PDF from UN Office on Drugs and Crime] on the march it smells like - slavery.

markfromireland


Commander: Contractors violating U.S. trafficking laws
BY CAM SIMPSON
Chicago Tribune

WASHINGTON - The top U.S. commander in Iraq has ordered sweeping changes for privatized military support operations after confirming violations of human-trafficking laws and other abuses by contractors involving possibly thousands of foreign workers on American bases, according to records obtained by the Chicago Tribune.

Gen. George Casey ordered that contractors be required by May 1 to return passports that have been illegally confiscated from laborers on U.S. bases after determining that such practices violated U.S. laws against trafficking for forced or coerced labor. Human brokers and subcontractors from South Asia to the Middle East have worked together to import thousands of laborers into Iraq from impoverished countries.

Two memos obtained by the Tribune indicate that Casey’s office concluded that the practice of confiscating passports from such workers was both widespread on American bases and in violation of the U.S. trafficking laws.

The memos, including an order dated April 4 and titled “Subject: Prevention of Trafficking in Persons in MNF-I,” or Multinational Forces-Iraq, say the military also confirmed a host of other abuses during an inspection of contracting activities supporting the U.S. military in Iraq. They include deceptive hiring practices; excessive fees charged by overseas job brokers who lure workers into Iraq; substandard living conditions once laborers arrive; violations of Iraqi immigration laws; and a lack of mandatory “awareness training” on U.S. bases concerning human trafficking.

Along with a separate memo from a top military procurement official to all contractors in Iraq, dated April 19 and titled, “Withholding of Passports, Trafficking in Persons,” Casey’s orders promise harsh actions against firms that fail to return passports or end other abusive practices. Contracts could be terminated, contractors could be blacklisted from future work, and commanders could physically bar firms from bases, the memos show.

“Contracts must incorporate appropriate language to compel the protection of individual rights (at both the contract and subcontract levels),” Casey’s orders say, adding that it was his goal to “to promote (the) rule of law in Iraq and in the labor recruiting process.”

Under future contracts, Casey is requiring that all firms, no matter how far down the chain, “provide workers with a signed copy of their employment contract that defines the terms of their employment.”

He’s ordering that contracts include “measurable, enforceable standards for living conditions (e.g., sanitation, health, safety, etc.) and establish 50 feet as the minimum acceptable square footage of personal living space per worker,” after finding that some conditions were substandard.

Contractors and subcontractors also must “comply with international laws” regarding transit, exit and entry procedures, “requirements for work visas,” and Iraqi immigration laws.

The orders also mandate that future contracts and subcontracts include “language that prohibits contractors and subcontractors at all tiers from utilizing unlicensed recruiting firms, or firms that charge illegal recruiting fees.”

The short-term impact of the orders is unclear, because the separate memo to contractors, which is dated April 19 and written by Col. Robert K. Boyles, a top official with the Joint Contracting Command-Iraq/Afghanistan, shows many of the reforms would be implemented by changes in the language in future contracts.

Nonetheless, the findings and actions represent a dramatic turnabout for the U.S. military, and follow three months of behind-the-scenes pressure on the Defense Department from State Department officials charged with monitoring and combating human trafficking worldwide.

The State Department launched an investigation and promised other actions earlier this year in response to a series published Oct. 9-10 by the Tribune, “Pipeline to Peril,” that detailed many of the abuses now cited in the memos.

The stories disclosed the often-illicit networks used to recruit low-skilled laborers from some of the world’s most impoverished and remote locales to work in menial jobs on American bases in Iraq.

Although other firms also have contracts supporting the military in Iraq, the United States has outsourced vital support operations to Halliburton subsidiary KBR at an unprecedented scale, at a cost to the United States of more than $12 billion as of late last year.

KBR, in turn, has outsourced much of that work to more than 200 subcontractors, many of them based in Middle Eastern nations condemned by the United States for failing to stem human trafficking into their own borders or for perpetrating other human rights abuses against foreign workers.

KBR’s subcontractors employ an army of workers to dish out food, wash clothes, clean latrines and carry out virtually every other menial task. About 35,000 of the 48,000 people working under the privatization contract last year were “Third Country Nationals,” who are non-Americans imported from outside Iraq, KBR has said.

“Pipeline to Peril,” which was based on reporting in the United States, Jordan, Iraq, Nepal and Saudi Arabia, described how some subcontractors and a chain of human brokers allegedly engaged in the same kinds of abuses routinely condemned by the State Department as human trafficking.

The newspaper retraced the journey of 12 men recruited in 2004 from rural villages in the Himalayan kingdom of Nepal and documented a trail of deceit, fraud and negligence stretching into Jordan and Iraq. Most of the men had contracts filed with their government falsely promising them positions at a five-star hotel in Amman, yet all 12 were sent into Iraq in August 2004. They were ultimately kidnapped from an unprotected caravan traveling along what was then one of the most dangerous roadways in the world: the Amman-to-Baghdad highway.

All 12 men were subsequently executed by militants in likely the single worst massacre of foreign workers in Iraq since the American-led invasion more than three years ago.

Those workers and others suffered from a chain of exploitation that began in their home countries, where families often assumed huge debts to pay fees demanded by brokers, to Iraq. Even after discovering they’d been deceived, workers felt compelled to head into the war zone, or remain in danger for much longer than they desired, just to pay those debts.

The Tribune also found evidence that subcontractors and brokers routinely seized workers’ passports, deceived them about their safety or contract terms and, in at least one case, allegedly tried to force terrified men into Iraq under the threat of cutting off their food and water.

The series also showed how KBR and the military left virtually every aspect of the recruitment, deployment and safety of such workers in the hands of their subcontractors. They also allowed subcontractors to employ workers from countries that had banned the deployment of their citizens to Iraq, meaning thousands were trafficked through illicit channels.

When told of the memos, John Miller, who heads the State Department office to monitor and combat human trafficking, credited the Tribune for shedding light on the illicit practices. He also praised the military for taking corrective action.

“Needless to say, we’re delighted,” Miller said. “This is progress, and we agree with the steps they’ve taken.”

Although allegations of such abuses began appearing in international press reports more than two years ago, and the Tribune’s own investigation was published last October, one of the memos calls on the military and the State Department to develop “an effective media strategy emphasizing the (military) Command’s pro-active response to the problem.”

Separate records also show that similar allegations had been raised in September 2004 with Joseph Schmitz, who was then the Department of Defense inspector general.

Schmitz did not respond in any detail until nearly a year later, saying in an Aug. 25, 2005, letter to Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., that there was a “list of corrective measures” ordered by coalition military officials in Iraq following “a preliminary inquiry” into the allegations. The letter did not mention passport seizures or violations of U.S. laws against human trafficking, but said living conditions “required further attention” and that officials were “monitoring the status of corrections” purportedly under way.

Schmitz resigned about two weeks later amid accusations that he stonewalled investigations. He took a job with Blackwater USA, a private security contractor.

It wasn’t the only time officials were made aware of such allegations. Last summer, the Army, which oversees the KBR privatization deal, deflected questions from the Tribune about human trafficking onto American bases in Iraq by saying “these are not Army issues.” Similarly, Halliburton said in a written statement that questions regarding “the recruitment practices” of its subcontractors “should be directed to the subcontractor.”

Melissa Norcross, a Halliburton spokeswoman, issued a statement from the company Sunday saying that KBR “fully supports the Department of Defense’s efforts to ensure that all contractor and subcontractor personnel working for the U.S. government be treated in a fair and humanitarian manner.”

The statement also echoed previous press releases from the company, saying KBR “operates under a rigorous code of business conduct that outlines legal and ethical behaviors that all employees and subcontractors are expected to follow in every aspect of their work. We do not tolerate any exceptions to this Code at any level of our company.”

The company has refused to say whether it has ever taken any action against subcontractors.

Another memo obtained by the Tribune, dated April 13 and addressed to all KBR project managers, deputy project managers and operations managers, indicates the company is requiring all of its personnel to undergo human-trafficking awareness training because of Casey’s orders.

A U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, confirmed the issuance of Casey’s orders in a statement to the Tribune on Sunday, saying the “rights to freedom of movement and quality living standards are serious issues.”

He also claimed, “There’s always been a focus on this, and this is one more clarification of that,” adding that the U.S. military has the ability to “terminate contracts and keep people off of bases.”

Casey’s orders came at about the same time the Defense Department published long-awaited interim rules that allow officials to cancel overseas defense contracts for trafficking violations.

But the orders go well beyond what is contained in the rules, and indicate that most of the measures stem from an inspection of the support operations by Casey’s command. Johnson said that inspection was conducted by the command’s inspector general’s office, a process that was started last October.

While the orders do not indicate how many workers have had their passports seized, the April 19 memo to contractors says evidence indicated a widespread practice of “holding and withholding employee passports.” It says passports are seized, in part, to keep workers from accepting jobs with other firms.

The Tribune identified three major KBR subcontractors that employed thousands of foreign workers on U.S. installations in Iraq and confiscated the passports of their foreign workers as a standard practice. At least two of those firms also have their own contracts with the United States.

The ultimate impact of the new orders will depend on how they’re implemented, and on several key, unanswered questions. Included among them: how U.S. military officials in Iraq hope to influence the conduct of village recruiters and human brokers across the globe who are several links up the chain from the subcontractors ultimately employing workers in Iraq.

Johnson said U.S. military officials would not immediately refer any contractors or subcontractors for prosecution.

Miller agreed that important questions remained, but called the new rules a major step forward. “I think they are heading in the right direction.”